Dave Gallaher
EF5
I'm not quite sure how they are figuring this, but...
http://www.weather.com/news/tornado-central/top-tornado-cities-2013-20130415
http://www.weather.com/news/tornado-central/top-tornado-cities-2013-20130415
I also see a sideshow of tornado photos that claim to be taken by people that didn't actually take them. The information on some of them is inaccurate too. I also don't understand how Tulsa can be ahead of OKC on this list, but maybe there is something I am missing here.
Do you have an example?
The "Rainbow and Tornado" photo in the original link is Eric Nguyen's Mulvane shot. I'm surprised the editors at TWC don't recognize the shot. It's one of the most famous tornado photos ever taken. Maybe nobody is paying attention over there or they just don't care about the integrity of their sources (random "iWitness" internet users).
Lmao when I clicked that link I got a nice photo of the Campo tornado with the caption that a "Microsoft Geek" snapped it this year in Colorado Springs. Also one of Hollingshead's pics from 2004 was credited to a random name from 2011. And people bitch at how some of us put watermarks in our pics...
it's (intentionally) biased toward where long-tracked, wide tornadoes often occur in outbreaks
I'm sure the Huntsville, AL Economic Development Council enjoys this little bit of "news".