Jim Egstad
Bad post, first timer and last timer too. Enjoy the weather, folks.
Last edited by a moderator:
Bad post, first timer and last timer too. Enjoy the weather, folks.
I'm on a bit of a safety kick right now with chasing, and wonder why people can't just take Bettis' presentation as having a purpose of presenting a personal experience/object lesson of the dangers of storm chasing, to instruct and warn newer chasers that reality isn't what they see on TV? Yes, he works for TWC, but listening to his presentation he wasn't trying to advertise TWC as much as he was telling his story. Cut the guy a break. He almost lost his life. (...and also Tim Marshall for that matter, if you've heard his El Reno experience).
Cut the guy a break? He literally saw a tornado a mile or two away and drove directly into the path of it trying to escape and almost killed everyone in the car with him. After railing on chasers for years for being reckless, it comes across as extremely hypocritical.
Back on topic... I ditched satellite TV several years ago and don't have access to cable in my neighborhood, so I haven't watched TWC in a long time. My impression is that their trajectory is following that of Discovery Channel, History Channel, and TLC in a transition away from what the name of the channel implies and towards mindless, lowest-common-denominator entertainment programming. Good riddance, I say.
+1. Around the turn of the millennium, my teenaged geek self could barely come up with enough VCRs (not to mention satellite tuners) to record all the programs I wanted to see on those four channels. Now it is very rare that I consider a program worth watching, and even those disappoint more often than not.
"To get back on the 20 million-subscriber service, Weather Channel has agreed to reduce reality programming by half on weekdays; return instant local weather; and allow DirecTV customers to watch the Weather Channel’s video programming on multiple devices inside and outside the home, so long as they can prove they are subscribers....
"The conciliatory statement marks an about-face of sorts for Weather Channel, which in early March seemed ready to invest more heavily in documentary-style series and reality programming, despite DirecTV’s objections and willingness to create a rival weather service during Weather Channel’s absence from its air.
"The agreement will not affect Weather Channel’s primetime lineup or future programming development, according to a spokeswoman forWeather Channel. The network has already replaced some of its longform programming on between the hours of 2 p.m. and 5 p.m. - think repeats of “Coast Guard Alaska,” “Prospectors” and the like - with live weather coverage."
I don't see why Mike B. gets singled out other than because he's a higher-profile media personality. The fact is that a lot of chasers, regardless of experience level, had very close calls (or were directly impacted) by the 5/31/13 El Reno tornado.
Back on topic...
I don't necessarily agree with TWC's approach or coverage but it's at least another source of weather and do like when they cover severe events live.
Bettes is a big part of TWC, so I don't think it's necessarily off-topic. He gets singled out for two reasons: because he made a very questionable decision that is arguably different than ones made by other chasers, and because of his past comments in front of an audience of millions on how reckless chasers are.
He raced a tornado to his south and drove into it - the other people on your list were trying to escape and just barely made it out of the way. Skip's video analyzing his position and decisions are 100x more enlightening than anything he's said about his experience, which is disappointing....
After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.
I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.
For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.
From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.
Sincerely, Jeff D.