After pondering this question for a few days and wanting to respond to this ignorant question,( ignorance being a lack of knowledge) I decided to give it a few days before I attempted to give an answer.
As noted already by rdale though, I am not sure this belongs in this forum.
Having been hit directly by two tornadoes (29 May 2004, 09 June 2005) of which both cases, I attempted to "ride" the tornado out due to ignorance....both tornadoes visually seemed "week". I will give one example:
09 June, 2005 I was reporting and sending live video back via the First Cam for KAKETV near the small community of Fowler KS. After sending live video
of tornadogensis occuring while doing my phoner, see video here:
http://www.ipixcel.org/ld.htm, I made a ignorant mistake and "held my ground" trying to get that last shot and because visually the tornado did not appear to be that strong (had little, if any debris). It was a very poor decision on my part and it cost me.
I was two blocks from the High School when it sustaned a direct hit, throwing debris into my vehical as I was trying to turn around and escape. Seconds later a brick from the school went through the back window of the CRV and hit me in the back of the head and ultimatly causing over $8,000 dollars damage to my transmitting equipment (iPixcel) and the vehical.
Some 11 stitches later while questioning myself as to the decisions I made while getting stiched up, I came to the conclusion that: YOU CAN NOT TELL HOW STRONG A TORNADO IS VISUALLY, Nor CAN YOU TELL WHAT IS EXACTLY IN THAT TORNADO in regards to debris. That said,
After learning the tornado was given an F-2 rating, I felt extremely lucky that I was not killed.
My point is, you can not tell how strong the tornado is or even what kind of debris it may have in it. Not to mention what that tornado would/could do to you if you were to "step into it".
Mr. Ketchum makes a valid point...even the very small things like straw, rocks, sand and any other debris that may not be visable is likely to "sand blast" you and or kill you by causing not only external but internal injuries as well.
Although I do not agree with or even like Mr Doswell, uncle Chuck makes a valid point also about Darwinism in regards to situations/qestions or ideas such as this.