Jeremy Lemanski
EF3
I was watching Nature tech on the history channel a little while ago and right at the end of the program, There was a statement that went like this: "Many think the days of 100 deaths from a single tornado are over"
Now, i wonder how they can say such a thing? Yes, the tech. that is being developed is improving warning times/prediction, but at the same time we have a growing population and what seems like more tornadoes in less likely places, such as the numbers which the ohio valley have put up in the last few years. Think about this: Its rush hour, 1,000s of people are on freeways in cars/trucks/vans. A supercell thunderstorm moves in and drops a tornado. It doesn't have to be a monster, maybe a F1 or F2. This tornado moves 4 miles along the highway, tossing 1,000s of these cars with people inside them and hitting many more of those who have tried to flee on foot. Do you think the death toll would be lower then 100
Thoughts?
Now, i wonder how they can say such a thing? Yes, the tech. that is being developed is improving warning times/prediction, but at the same time we have a growing population and what seems like more tornadoes in less likely places, such as the numbers which the ohio valley have put up in the last few years. Think about this: Its rush hour, 1,000s of people are on freeways in cars/trucks/vans. A supercell thunderstorm moves in and drops a tornado. It doesn't have to be a monster, maybe a F1 or F2. This tornado moves 4 miles along the highway, tossing 1,000s of these cars with people inside them and hitting many more of those who have tried to flee on foot. Do you think the death toll would be lower then 100
Thoughts?