• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

SPC Says No

I like how the word "No is centerd on Kansas too. I know the word is centerd on the country itself, but it looks like a horrible SDS-causing message on Kansas chasers. "Might as well save your vactions now, because there are "NO" severe thunderstorms forecast here or anywhere. The Gulf is cut off. Nothing but bright sunshine and dry weather. No tornadoes, damaging wind, hail, lightning, thunder, rain, supercells, mesos, wall clouds, beaver tails, arcus, mammatus, TCu, Cb's, and/or ACCAS. No Classic, HP, or LP, just NP!! Nothing! Zilch! Nada!" :lol: :lol:

Seriously, that really sucks. :( :(

Well, maybe a few storms today but then its over. :(
 
That image is for real, and as of 12:30MDT, it was still included on SPC's Day 3...

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/day3otlk.html

I saved it to my site for archiving purposes as the image in the first post is linked from my website. I find it hilarious! :lol:

BWT, that 'NO' seems to be centered over Sumner County in Kansas, as most of us know, was the 'YES' spot several times this year! *LOL*
 
The joke is on them, there will be a massive outbreak here in NC Kansas......and back to reality. :wink: Though we did have a little thunder earlier today:) We'll take what we can get.

Tim
 
That big "No" should be moved NE into the midwest. The bright sunshine is gonna blind me. At least y'all down south have some heat and instabilty.
 
This may be more serious than we thought...

I just noticed the forecasters name is Corfidi - he's a verteran from way back when the SPC was in KC.
 
The NOAA and NWS executive bureaucrats would love that.

1. It's effective, decisive, and simple.
2. Requires no human intervention: can be produced straight from ETA output.
3. And the old NWS and AWS (now AFWA) axiom: Change for the sake of change! Renaming NCEP branches gets kinda old.

Tim
 
My God! Only a meteorologist can appreciate the humor in the 'you bet,' 'get real,' and 'maybe' forecasts. That is great, a classic!
 
Back
Top