Mike Hollingshead
If one has a nowcaster I wouldn't think they'd consider themselves very gadget free and such sky readers. At least with the gadgets and no nowcaster you are figuring the things out on your own(with the info the nowcaster would have).
Sometimes it is hard to see those surface boundaries with your eyes from 100+ miles away(pre-convection). Go gadgets! Paper maps would also take up more of your "sky time" than if you had been running GPS.
Do you wonder if you had info if you'd of been there sooner and further sw to see the first torandoes though? Seeing the cool things period is very rewarding and having info on stuff you can't see will always help you to that. Being very annoyed you missed stuff because of a lack of data while on the road I think would take away from any of the "reward" feeling of doing it with "no data".
Sometimes it is hard to see those surface boundaries with your eyes from 100+ miles away(pre-convection). Go gadgets! Paper maps would also take up more of your "sky time" than if you had been running GPS.
Some of our most rewarding chases (example: May 16, 2004) were done without laptops, just choosing the target (in that case, O Neill), and sticking with it and getting there at the right time.
Do you wonder if you had info if you'd of been there sooner and further sw to see the first torandoes though? Seeing the cool things period is very rewarding and having info on stuff you can't see will always help you to that. Being very annoyed you missed stuff because of a lack of data while on the road I think would take away from any of the "reward" feeling of doing it with "no data".