• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

probabilities

Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
43
Location
Maplewood, NJ/New York City
Here in NJ today, we got our first severe thunderstorm watch of the year. Like many of you I'm sure, I went and looked at the probs for severe events, and I became confused. Here were the probs:

Tornadoes
Probability of 2 or more tornadoes


Low (20%)
Probability of 1 or more strong (F2-F5) tornadoes


Low (5%)
Wind
Probability of 10 or more severe wind events


Mod (50%)
Probability of 1 or more wind events > 65 knots


Mod (30%)
Hail
Probability of 10 or more severe hail events


Mod (30%)
Probability of 1 or more hailstones > 2 inches


Low (20%)
Combined Severe Hail/Wind
Probability of 6 or more combined severe hail/wind events


High (70%)

I was hoping some of you more familiar with the SPC than I could clear this up. If the individual wind/hail threats are moderate, then how does the combined threat become high? Why is the combined not moderate as well, especially considering how low the other probs are.

Thanks.
 
I'm sure one could do a detailed statistical explanation, but I'll just say that the def'n of the "combined" category only requires 6 severe reports, while the individual wind and hail categories have probabilities for 10 severe reports. Ideally, if the met thinks that 4 hail and 4 wind reports are possible, they verify well with 0% 10+ hail report, 0% 10+ wind reports, and 100% 6+ total severe reports. It looks like it was a rather low-end watch, with a mix of several severe hail and severe wind reports expected. Thus, there was an expectation of>6 combined severe reports, but severe hail and severe wind reports weren't expected to be particularly common (so the individual probs for 10+ reports were relatively low).
 
Perhaps they count the severe hail/wind events separately? It seems odd that such a high probability for 6 or more combined events is 70% while 10 or more hail events is 30%. That's a confident dropoff if the two categories overlap IMO.
 
I'm sure one could do a detailed statistical explanation, but I'll just say that the def'n of the "combined" category only requires 6 severe reports, while the individual wind and hail categories have probabilities for 10 severe reports. Ideally, if the met thinks that 4 hail and 4 wind reports are possible, they verify well with 0% 10+ hail report, 0% 10+ wind reports, and 100% 6+ total severe reports. It looks like it was a rather low-end watch, with a mix of several severe hail and severe wind reports expected. Thus, there was an expectation of>6 combined severe reports, but severe hail and severe wind reports weren't expected to be particularly common (so the individual probs for 10+ reports were relatively low).

Ahh. That makes sense now. thanks.
 
Back
Top