Pictures on the "Daily Mail" site

[Dave Gallaher]

Tiny tornadoes, followed by rfd blasting the storm to pieces, and scud moving by overhead over 70 mph turned into that above. lol So far the UK seems the worst at handling things you said(or simply have on your site). The Sunday Times article last fall said I took shelter in a town on my first chase, and when I came out, the entire town around me was destroyed. That after I actually said I took shelter and a big violent tornado went just south of town, destroying a couple farm houses. They also said I skipped Christmas to chase. I was like, I did? I should remember chasing in late December, let alone on Christmas! I think I said that I would, after I was promted to come up with things I'd skip to go chasing.

Isn't it educational to be interviewed for publication? Regardless of whether it's a direct 'quote' attributed or an actual live or phone interview, there's nearly always mistakes made. I still think that everyone should be interviewed and published at least once in their adult lives--it would certainly change their views regarding news accuracy.

Congrats on the book--hope to find a copy down here before too long.

 

[John Bowles]

The Dailymail is practically a tabloid, judging from the articles of their's I've seen on Digg. When I saw "Amazing Storm Photos" mentioned on dpreview I thought "Probably Mike H's photos again" before I even clicked the link. At least they gave credit I guess, even if they did mess them up (What's with the jacked up cyan?).

Anyway, the book is incredible, worth every penny and then some.

"Daily Mail reader" is a not-exactly flattering stereotype in the UK, and not entirely undeserved.

But in any case, even they can't blame tornadoes on brown people, so what they can screw up is limited to factual issues.

 

[Paul Knightley]

The Daily Mail is, perhaps, journalism at its worst...every front page story is of a scaremongering type, often blaming "illegal immigrants" or other minority groups. It's largely read by conservative/right-wing people of advanced years, who tend to believe in what it writes.

 

[Dave Gallaher]

The Daily Mail is, perhaps, journalism at its worst...every front page story is of a scaremongering type, often blaming "illegal immigrants" or other minority groups. It's largely read by conservative/right-wing people of advanced years, who tend to believe in what it writes.

It must be the UK version of Fox News.