• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

New Years Monster Storm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike Hollingshead
  • Start date Start date
The operational run might be a bit of an outlier - the ensemble suggests considerable spread still with this system:

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/images/ens/spa...ag_f144_us.html

What they do agree with is an impressive ridge building in over the Yukon, which favors dislodging a cold air mass to sail into the northern plains - so at least that much appears a good bet. There were meaningful words of caution also in the NCEP discussion today:

...CENTRAL...
ECMWF REMAINS PREFERENCE HERE WITH MUCH WEAKER SHORTWAVE AND ESP SFC LOW REFLECTION LIFTING NEWD FROM THE CENTRAL PLAINS TO THE LAKES REGION WITH MUCH LESS FRONTAL PENETRATION SWD THAN GFS SERIES DAYS 5-7 SUN-TUES.

As such, you might be cautious of GFS forecasts for a few more cycles.

Glen
 
Originally posted by Glen Romine
The operational run might be a bit of an outlier - the ensemble suggests considerable spread still with this system:

http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/images/ens/spa...ag_f144_us.html

What they do agree with is an impressive ridge building in over the Yukon, which favors dislodging a cold air mass to sail into the northern plains - so at least that much appears a good bet. There were meaningful words of caution also in the NCEP discussion today:

...CENTRAL...
ECMWF REMAINS PREFERENCE HERE WITH MUCH WEAKER SHORTWAVE AND ESP SFC LOW REFLECTION LIFTING NEWD FROM THE CENTRAL PLAINS TO THE LAKES REGION WITH MUCH LESS FRONTAL PENETRATION SWD THAN GFS SERIES DAYS 5-7 SUN-TUES.

As such, you might be cautious of GFS forecasts for a few more cycles.

Glen

Yeah, plus it's still a good ways away. Since everyone here seems to be talking about different storms, I may go ahead and start an "Ice Storm" thread, as the ETA and other models are still consistant in the 72-84 hour time frame of a good precipitation event occuring over a shallow cold layer in the Midwest/Great Lakes. Also warranting a new thread, is the fact that this one was designed for a "New Years" event, and now we are kind of straying beyond the original time frame.
 
Back
Top