• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Minimum windspeed values

STurner

EF2
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
182
Location
Shawnee, KS 66217
I know this is a little strange to be discussing but I could not help but notice it over the past several years. It seems that most NWS offices have always put their violent tornadoes at the lower end of the violent categories. For example they may rate a tornado a low-end F4/EF4 and discuss about the damage and state that a well-built brick home was swept clean off its foundation. They will show photos of this home and all that was left was the foundation with little or no trace of debris. Now I know even to go low-end F4/EF4 it would have to be of pretty good quality construction but just how "well-built" is "well-built." By defenition some of these homes seem to fit as a solid F4/EF4 or near F5/EF5. To me a low-end F4/EF4 would be a well-built house that was flattened to a small pile of debris laying on top of the foundation or nearby. Now why I am no expert by any means but is there like specific types of well-built homes. While I am also not dogging on anybody but have seen that NWS in Paducah always assigns their violent tornadoes at the lower end value and some of them seem to have approahed F5/EF5 status. In addition I have seen it from quite a bit from other NWS offices as well. While it doesn't matter what part of the category you assign it for an EF4 tornado is an EF4 tornado but it just tended to make me wonder why other values are not used.
 
Back
Top