• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

Gulf of Mexico Surface Temps Well Below Normal

Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
295
Just checked out the NHC webpage to see how things were getting organized with the start of the hurricane season only about a half month away, and checked out the sea surface temps and variances from normal.

Temps in the GOM appear to be only 22C to 27C

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb/atl_anal.gif


And it looks like the temps are as much as 3C or more below normal, especially near the shorelines.

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/tafb/atl_anom.gif


The severe season is missing a lot of hydrothermal energy that the GOM usually provides - perhaps that is why May numbers seem down, after the first 4 months appear to have higher than average tornado counts. :?:
 
http://cwcaribbean.aoml.noaa.gov/anom/17/d.../day/200526.gif

Glen Romine posted that link in another thread... At any rate, the persistent, unrelenting cold front passages, and associated cloud-cover and precipitation, is likely one of the most signficant contributors to the below-normal SSTs. And of course, the persistent cold front passages can be attributed to the persistent northeastern US / Hudson Bay upper-level low (highly negative 500mb height anomalies) that persisted much of the early-mid Spring. Don't look know, as it appears likely that we'll have more eastern-US troughing / western US ridging. While the tornado count through April was avg or above-avg, much of that activity was associated with cold-core activity or southeastern US activity. There has been a SEVERE lack of tornadic activity associated with warm-sector convection in the plains. I don't recall warm-sector significant supercells in the plains aside from April 21st, and then May 10th, 12th, and 13th.
 
Right Jeff, I posted that earlier (don't recall where). Here is a better link to get the newer images for this year:

http://cwcaribbean.aoml.noaa.gov/anom/17/d.../2005index.html

I know of at least one study that tried to find correlations between cooler GoM temps and severe weather probabilties by Edwards and Weiss of SPC-

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/publications/edwar...ards/sstsvr.htm

I'll quote a few relavent points from the summary:

1) Cold SST anomalies are representative of more frequent deep frontal penetrations over the Gulf, which lower the SST and adversely interrupt the return flow cycle. Thus, low level instability and resultant severe thunderstorm potential are greatly diminished.......

......however, low SST would more reliably suggest relatively inactive severe storm periods.

So far that seems to be holding in relatively well. There have been some marginal setups this year that have produced well though - so hopefully more are to come as I haven't really started my chase season yet this year.

Glen
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Warren Eckels
Back
Top