• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

concerning Sunday's 7-11 storms moving through the KC area...

Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
53
Location
Joplin, MO
I had been watching the t-storm cells that were moving through the KEAX area via GRLevel3 late this Sunday morning/early afternoon. There was one cell that was in KS on the Douglas and Johnson Co. line that was showing what I thought was hook for a while and as well as storms E/SE of KC metro. Mike posted on the Nowcast "EAX shows four cells with weakly rotating updrafts attempting to make the transition into supercells." and "Hook echo with TVS approaching Ionia, MO". I thought at the time KEAX would have issued at least a T-Storm Warning for at least one of the cells. I think as they got further away from KC they eventually did. I do realize the storms have to meet certain NWS criteria (or public reports) to be severe or tor warned. So now the storms move into the KSGF CWA and they are issuing severe thunderstorm warnings as well as tornado warnings all over the place. Now the tornado warnings for Benton, Morgan and Miller were all radar indicated at the time of my writing this. What gives? The storms to me looked just as strong as they did when they were in the KEAX CWA as they are now in the KSGF CWA. The storms are actually on the fringe of KSGF warning area and radar. I am still learning so maybe I am just over thinking this or nitpicking as my wife says. I just wonder if there is a difference in thinking between NWSO offices.
 
As for the morning storm :

I know exactly what storm you are referring to..

The thing is, it really did not have the environment to become what we call "surface based", it was 10am ish I recall.

Once this happens, in simple terms, the storm can strengthen, take advantage of better moisture, instability etc, aka be a stronger storm with a more powerful updraft.

The storm today had decent rotation but nothing really pronounced below 10,000 feet. The sig. wx statement that was issued was for the rain/small hail/wind that would impact the area when the core was to collapse on itself..

Probably the same things this afternoon. You can get a good hail core pretty much anytime. That is why it is beneficial to know the environment you are working with to determine if a storm is likely to become surface based. The storms tor warned in MO now are on a differential heating/outflow boundary which was being enhanced as the day goes on too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brandon,

Thanks for your explanation. That makes sense now. You know I could see on the radar the inflow into that particular storm as well as others. I really appreciate you explaining it 'cause I was at a loss trying to understand what I was seeing on radar.

Sincerely,
Todd
 
Back
Top