• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2016-04-15 EVENT: CO/KS/OK/NM/TX

I've been trying to tell myself to not bite on today, but the RAP this morning really makes me want to bite. The NAM had been showing some very cool (65-70F) surface temperatures, and I wasn't really that excited. Now the RAP is bringing the dryline east with a nice bulge and a 996MB low in NM right around 00Z and surface temperatures 75-80.

a14cbed07d89fe3180c5f8576235795c.png

One thing that has been consistent is the nice soundings - No weaknesses in the hodographs, especially south of I-40 where you seem to get a better punch at 200mb. Moisture is always a concern, but I think mid to upper 50's are possible, and that seems to get it done. Surface mixing ratios appear to be in the 10-11 range, so that is not too horrible and sufficient for tornadoes.

MLCAPE values appear to be around 1500 for most of the forecast soundings I saw, and a little extra moisture would boost that up.

Not a slam dunk by any means, but probably worth a chase.
 
I'm not chasing this event, however if I were I'd probably target somewhere in the Northwest Texas PAN region (Dumas/Dalhart). HRRR has been consistent in showing cells firing in an area from here up into SE Colorado later today into tonight. I think for me the big question is moisture quality and whether its going to be enough to get things done. No doubt the environment after 00z *should* become supportive of at least a couple tornadoes in any cells that remain discrete in mode. Overall there are too many questions to get me to drive 12+ hours for such a setup. Good luck to anyone heading out though.
 
Plenty of 53-55˚F dewpoints showing up in observations across the TX Panhandle. That remnant cloud cover is really helping keep mixing in check for now. If we can get a bit more deep layer moisture in place by initiation time, it should be a fairly exciting evening considering 40-50+ kt effective shear magnitudes oriented cleanly normal to the dryline. The CAMs have been quite bullish from the start with this.
 
TTU WRF dom_2km_all_stp_f14.gif Like Ethan...I am not chasing today but do agree with his target area. Here is the SigTor forecast for 16/00Z from the 12Z run of the Texas Tech 3-KM WRF. Values are generally 5+...fairly impressive with the somewhat limited moisture. It is likely more from the shear and helicity.

View attachment 12487
 
Last edited:
I think moisture will be the big problem today, but I might be wrong. Td's in the low to mid 50's might be ok later on this evening when the LLJ gets going and the bases lower due to less T-Td spreads.
 
I'd like to make a suggestion to the mods/owners of Stormtrack that I think would be educational. Each Target Area Event thread should have (as its final post) a screen shot of the SPC storm reports for the day.
Obviously user reports would still belong in a REPORTS thread (and a link could be provided from the end of the Target Area Event thread to the Reports thread, when there is one). But just a graphic of the Reports would serve to let others see whose forecasts verified.

d933cdcfdfe0f115c7c859f9ca75b783.png
 
Back
Top