First of all, congrats John because this was your 1,000th post!
I positioned myself near Albert Lea MN where the HRRR indicated mid-afternoon initiation. I latched onto a cell that looked somewhat healthy and followed it SE into Iowa for two hours or so, but there was NO WAY this thing was going to spin something up so I headed home to Des Moines on I-35 around 6pm.
As the line fired southwest along the boundary, picturesque cells popped up in a modestly discrete manner to my southeast but all of them looked weak. Despite 70+ dewpoints, bases were relatively high, and anvils were spreading out H4 at best. Lame.
The line was moving SE, and I am sure one of these cells eventually (sigh) dropped the Traer / Reinbeck tornadoes as well as one recorded near Newton, IA...
Okay, PLEASE don't flame me for my lack of meteorological insight, but...
1. These were very picturesque but weak-looking cells. Supercell? No way.
2. At no time did I see an indication of a meso, either visually or radar-indicated.
3. Did I mention these cells were pathetic and weak?
4. Pathetic. Weak. Lackluster convection despite 3500+ CAPE forecasts.
5. See attached pic. Pretty! (but weak)
While I am sorry I didn't blindly chase after these lame, pathetic cells and grab fantastic pics of the tornadoes everyone else seems to have (I might be slightly bitter coming back from a 380 mile bust) but I need to ask:
Were these LANDSPOUTS? Because that's the only way I can reconcile this in my head.
Everything I know about tornadic activity was NOT present this day, yet everyone (including a co-worker with a cellphone camera) seems to have awesome pics of a tornado 30 miles from my home while I was busy driving nearly 400 miles chasing after absolute crap.
Someone please talk me down from the ledge.
TR