Jeff Snyder
EF5
Well, that was a tremendously underwhelming chase. We deployed (with RaXPol) twice, but the data are probably pretty uninteresting. Nearly all of the convection-resolving models (4 km EMC WRF, 4 km NSSL, and various HRRR runs) that I looked at only showed scant areas of weak updraft helicity for nearly all storms in OK during the day. The biggest concern I had for today was destabilization given widespread stratocumulus and showers that moved through central OK during the late morning and early afternoon. However, vis sat showing some insolation occurring west of the initial round of showers and weak thunderstorms, and surface obs showed temperatures responding (with 78-84+ F temps in southwestern OK and western N TX). So, we headed southwest from OUN towards LAW. We ended up on one storm that moved from near Lawton to Cement, but it had a flat, featureless base and looked poor on radar. With more semi-discrete storms to the S, we opted to re-target a storm SW of Lawton. By the time we got in position for this storm, there were more storms developing to the immediate S of our target storm. We watched this one from just E of Lawton, but it too was relatively unimpressive. Motion at cloud base was almost non-existent. We then punted around the area between LAW and Marlow for the next hour and a half before ending the chase.
I figured we'd at least get something decent out of a strong trough pushing through the Plains with seasonably high moisture (68-70 F Td) in place, but it was not to be. The only pictures I took were right before sunset when we had a beautiful sky near Rush Springs, OK.
The 18z OUN sounding did look much better than I was expecting (>300 m2/s2 0-1km SRH, 1600 j/kg MLCAPE, etc.). Even the 00z OUN sounding looks pretty good (much better than I was expecting as we were watching mushy, low-topped trash near I44 in the 5:30-7:00 period), but it's apparent that the near-surface layer was just a little too cool to support true surface-based convection. Storms ingesting parcels primarily from 1 km AGL ended up experiencing much weaker vertical shear since much of the low-level shear was focused in the immediate 0-1 km layer. Heck, the hodograph curves counterclockwise above 1 km, with almost no streamwise vorticity in the 1-3 km layer for a surface-based right-mover, and it looks like there's more significant negative SRH for a left-mover than positive SRH for a right-mover (for storms not ingesting near-surface parcels).
Meh.
I figured we'd at least get something decent out of a strong trough pushing through the Plains with seasonably high moisture (68-70 F Td) in place, but it was not to be. The only pictures I took were right before sunset when we had a beautiful sky near Rush Springs, OK.
The 18z OUN sounding did look much better than I was expecting (>300 m2/s2 0-1km SRH, 1600 j/kg MLCAPE, etc.). Even the 00z OUN sounding looks pretty good (much better than I was expecting as we were watching mushy, low-topped trash near I44 in the 5:30-7:00 period), but it's apparent that the near-surface layer was just a little too cool to support true surface-based convection. Storms ingesting parcels primarily from 1 km AGL ended up experiencing much weaker vertical shear since much of the low-level shear was focused in the immediate 0-1 km layer. Heck, the hodograph curves counterclockwise above 1 km, with almost no streamwise vorticity in the 1-3 km layer for a surface-based right-mover, and it looks like there's more significant negative SRH for a left-mover than positive SRH for a right-mover (for storms not ingesting near-surface parcels).
Meh.