• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2012-02-12: Extreme winds in southern Texas

Jeff Duda

site owner, PhD
Staff member
Site owner
Supporter
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
3,822
Location
Thornton, CO
I have serious doubts as to the legitimacy of 150 kt wind gusts at an ASOS station in the big bend region of south Texas. There isn't much in the way of significant terrain, but there is a slope in the region, so I suppose this could be a function of orographic dynamics. However, I even doubt the anemometer at an ASOS station could survive 150 kt wind gusts. But, I could be wrong. If those winds are legitimate, that's quite the significant wind gust. That would surely do serious damage to the airport.
 
I'm relatively comfortable QAing out those observations. The peak wind that K6R6 reported was 149-150 kts, which is, as you noted, so far beyond the nearby wind obs to throw up a red flag. I'm not sure what the state record is, but I think that's probably beyond that. There was a high wind warning in effect for the Guadalupe mountains overnight last night into this morning for wind gusts up to 60 mph, but Sanderson isn't very close to Guadalupe Pass. There aren't any LSRs from MAF to indicate extreme damage around 6R6. Maybe some precip somehow managed to mess up the electronics of the anemometer enough for to it give erroneous obs.
 
There seems to be a build-up over the half-hour period shown by the link, beginning at 92 kts at 1848Z, so at least there's some sense of consistency. But it's consistency as in "consistently screwy." Current METARs across Texas show the highest surface winds at 20 kts up in the NW panhandle, and VADs aren't at all impressive. I can't imagine where such winds would come from, given that they were logged just an hour-and-a-half or so ago. My verdict: equipment failure. Someone go slap some sense into that anemometer.
 
And that station has a number of other sensors not working as well. If it was in proper mountains I might investigate further... but in fairly flat terrain, theres just no way.
 
The 6R6 ASOS is at the Terrell County Airport. The terrain is indeed rather flat. Here's a picture of the airport:

5037539375_91cb7ae1e9.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top