• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

07/17/09 NOW: CO/KS/NE

Jeff Duda

site owner, PhD
Staff member
Site owner
Supporter
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
3,822
Location
Thornton, CO
Storms have been firing since early this morning along an old outflow boundary/warm front in W NE. Now those storms have progressed southward in to KS and extreme eastern CO and are looking more and more impressive by the minute. Cell in Cheyenne Co., KS (near St. Francis) looks like a supercell moving SSW with the rotation or convergence/divergence signature all the way on the far north side of the storm. Also, another cell to the southeast, currently in Logan and Gove Cos., KS, has taken on a cell-bow echo shape and is dropping an OFB that the first storm is about to intersect. My guess is, when that storm picks up the vorticity from the outflow boundary, it will definitely go tornadic or at least significantly supercellular.

ADDITION: just as I was typing this, the cell in Cheyenne Co. picked up an anticyclonic fish hook shape and is indeed rotating anticyclonically on the northeast side of the storm, yet has a small echo overhang on the southwest side of it with maybe the slightest hint of cyclonic rotation.

SECOND ADDITION: That storm has been showing a gnarly hail spike on it for quite a few scans. It also appears to have turned even more to the southwest after having met with the OFB.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
please add TX to this thread.

storm went up near stratford, TX. is now svr warned and looking more and more supercellular as its in a better environment then the storm in NM that had more convection go up around it and interfere.


Matt
 
Back
Top