Add a couple more zeros to Option 2, then it might start to become a fair fight, at least for me.
I think it might be 1 photogenic vs ∞ crappy tornadoes to me.
Many tornadoes I have witnessed, I wouldn't miss at all if I hadn't seen them. They're count padders. I'd go even further and say that if there were no photogenic tornadoes, only "crappy" ones I probably wouldn't even care to chase them at all. This includes any dust whirl bird fart, but here's a good example from last year:
The faint left and right edge of a wedge is visible to the left of the cone satellite. Eh, so what if it's a 1.5 mile wide EF3, you can barely see the damn thing. It's a big, crappy tornado. I'd trade that for a pretty little bean field rope any day.
This is another reason why I put importantance on documenting and having photos of the tornadoes you see. If you've seen 200 tornadoes, but 180 of them were crap, so what? If you don't have photos of them, that number means almost nothing to me. But of course many chasers don't care what others think about their count or photos, and that's cool too.
Or 12 tornadoes on one particular chase, and one of them was good. If I only saw that one good tornadoes and missed the 11 others, no real loss. They're only for number bragging. This is often why I'll abandon an HP or difficult night chase even if it does cost me a few tornadoes. It's just not worth it to be able to say I saw some (crappy) tornadoes.