• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

U.s. Copyright Office Seeking Comment On Possible Reforms

Joined
Jan 14, 2011
Messages
3,447
Location
St. Louis
There is still time (until August 24) to submit official comments to the Copyright Office about potential reforms. I just sent mine in today - here is the link:

https://www.federalregister.gov/art...copyright-protection-for-certain-visual-works

Here is what I sent in:

I am a small-time photographer and cameraman. My comments have to deal with my three biggest copyright infringement problems:

1.) I need an affordable way to pursue smaller infringement cases that an attorney will not pursue. Contingency fee attorneys will not pursue cases where profit or cost recovery to them will be impossible. I cannot afford to file a federal claim on my own for small time cases. I would likely not recover my costs even if I did win. The result is that I cannot pursue more than 90% of infringement cases.

2.) Foreign individuals must not be able to send DMCA counter-notifications in the USA. Currently, someone outside of the US knows that they can file a false counter-claim vs my DMCA takedown, because my only recourse is to file an expensive federal claim just to keep the infringing material from being reposted. They also know that it is extremely difficult and expensive for me to pursue an infringement case outside of the US. Thus, they abuse the counter-notifications and make it impossible for me to take down infringing copies (such as on Youtube).

3.) Service providers with a history of repeated infringements must provide an automated system to take down infringing material. For example, I must spend at least one hour per day patrolling Youtube for infringing re-uploads of my videos. I send hundreds of DMCA takedowns to Youtube every year, all must be done manually by me. Youtube so far has refused to grant me access to their Content ID system which would automate the process.
 
Back
Top