Jim Bailey
EF0
An interesting story from my home town paper. I will be following this to see what comes of it:
http://www.nwarktimes.com/adg/News/262125/
JB
http://www.nwarktimes.com/adg/News/262125/
JB
Report false storm info, go to jail?
- Thread starter Jim Bailey
- Start date
Jesse Risley
Staff member
It will be interesting to see what comes of this. Jail time would likely be highly dependent of multiple factors, especially taking into account the nature of the report and the offender's previous criminal record and/or record of falsifying severe weather reports. My bet would be that this incident, if successfully prosecuted, would result in something like a "stiff" fine (over $1,000) and possibly probation.
Jason Foster
I am really surprised this has not happened more often. It is so easy to falsify a report, especially if anyone has just a tiny bit of knowledge. I bet if the story garners more attention in the media, it'll feed those who think it's cool to do the same thing, regardless of the law or jail time.
Damon Poole
EF2
Deliberately report false storm info, go to jail? Absolutely!
This is no different than a false fire alarm or a false police report. I hope they do throw the book at whoever did it. It would be one thing if it were simply a mistake by a well meaning citizen, but to deliberately file a false report, especially if it takes time and resources away from legitimate warnings being issued is and always should be unacceptable. Cuff 'em and stuff 'em!
This is no different than a false fire alarm or a false police report. I hope they do throw the book at whoever did it. It would be one thing if it were simply a mistake by a well meaning citizen, but to deliberately file a false report, especially if it takes time and resources away from legitimate warnings being issued is and always should be unacceptable. Cuff 'em and stuff 'em!
Pete Smith
EF0
And while we're at it, put them in the same cell as the morons who keep calling 911 when their local fast food joint runs out of chicken nuggets!
Chris Carter
EF3
If a tornado did hit a McDonald's, i would expect free Big Mac's falling out of the sky.
Drew.Gardonia
i think jail is a bit extreme, especially considering Cleveland Browns receiver Donte Stallworth received only 30 days of jail for killing a man while driving intoxicated with a BAC of .126
but it should be a $500 fine, and attending a mandatory spotter training class, so one doesn't much such a stupid mistake again, and 100 hours of community service serving as a spotter for his/her community.
but it should be a $500 fine, and attending a mandatory spotter training class, so one doesn't much such a stupid mistake again, and 100 hours of community service serving as a spotter for his/her community.
Chris Carter
EF3
Agreed, but he must have the necessary equipment to storm chase. A backpack, a road map, a battery powered weather radio, and a bicycle. enjoy.
Drew.Gardonia
I said nothing about chasing. I said spot. you can be a spotter without having to chase.
go sit on a hill, and watch.
terra seright
LOL! Spotting Barney Fife Style!!!
We reported a tornado a couple of years ago...and had eyes on it, saw it very clearly....but were not trained or on any spotter list...so the report was not taken seriously. We got a simple "OK, thank you." and they hung up. Now, we're on the weather net, and easily identifiable...and we are taken much more seriously.
Wonder if the "Category 2 on the EF scale" bit might have given a clue??
When a report of rotation was phoned in a couple of weeks ago, net control was asking us spotters for confirmation. Nothing gets to the news station until it gets confirmed. People call in reports all the time around here....such as the "wall cloud" that was actually a simple lowering from the end of a shelf. I'd have been a bit freaked out by it too, had I not been trained. It was a very ominous-looking cloud...but there was no rotation in it.
I just can't see putting something on the news that has not been confirmed. Were there not any recognized spotters in the area? Do they not use SN around there? Maybe they should!
We went to KS last week and couldn't believe there was not a spotter radio net in the area...but that's no excuse, since I could look on SN and see the reports....
I think the obvious hoax calls/emails (especially the email with the photo) should be punished in some form, that's for sure...but then, what if someone actually sees a tornado and is afraid to call it in because they're afraid of being punished for a false report??
We reported a tornado a couple of years ago...and had eyes on it, saw it very clearly....but were not trained or on any spotter list...so the report was not taken seriously. We got a simple "OK, thank you." and they hung up. Now, we're on the weather net, and easily identifiable...and we are taken much more seriously.
Wonder if the "Category 2 on the EF scale" bit might have given a clue??
When a report of rotation was phoned in a couple of weeks ago, net control was asking us spotters for confirmation. Nothing gets to the news station until it gets confirmed. People call in reports all the time around here....such as the "wall cloud" that was actually a simple lowering from the end of a shelf. I'd have been a bit freaked out by it too, had I not been trained. It was a very ominous-looking cloud...but there was no rotation in it.
I just can't see putting something on the news that has not been confirmed. Were there not any recognized spotters in the area? Do they not use SN around there? Maybe they should!
We went to KS last week and couldn't believe there was not a spotter radio net in the area...but that's no excuse, since I could look on SN and see the reports....
I think the obvious hoax calls/emails (especially the email with the photo) should be punished in some form, that's for sure...but then, what if someone actually sees a tornado and is afraid to call it in because they're afraid of being punished for a false report??
J Holder
EF2
Do you REALLY want someone convicted of sending false weather reports to do community service as a storm spotter? That would be like having a person convicted of DUI do community service tending bar at the VFW post lounge.
John Robinson
EF1
The U.S. Attorney has made it clear, via quotes in the newspaper, that people who are simply mistaken will not be considered for prosecution.
Marcus Hicks
EF2
False severe wx/tornado reports should be treated like a false police report. Any fines should be in the amount to cover city, state and any other resource expense.
Chris Sokol
EF5
It's not going to be (at least one would assume) applied to those who are mistaken, but to those who intentionally...aka for thrills or to get their name on TV...call in misleading information. I think that a lot of us are familiar with a couple of infamous events that have occurred in Oklahoma.
Derek Weston
EF5
I always say... an eye for an eye.
Jail time for a false severe report? What does that teach you?
I say the person that made the false report should have to endure exactly what they reported. (when it occurs at some later date)
Naked and shelterless.
Jail time for a false severe report? What does that teach you?
I say the person that made the false report should have to endure exactly what they reported. (when it occurs at some later date)
Naked and shelterless.
