View attachment 9521 actually the Nikon is cheaper too...hmmm... glad I'm not in your shoes lol, just get a Sony A7r II & let us all know how great it is
For me I don't care about focus points or $48. I would pay an extra $100 if the EOS T5 would record longer than 12 min. This makes a 4GB file and that's that. Close that file and open a new one? Most likely within 1/30second? noooo. This algorithm is beyond Canon. Prolly Nikon too? Also the exposure jumps. My T5 has quite noticeable exposure jumps. Bet I could fix this too.
The higher Dynamic Range is cool. Double the pics is real nice.
And the lack of built in timelapse amazes me. I mean come on Canon! It's quite simple. Write 1 frame, throw away X frames, repeat.
And lastly, another $50 if there's an option to have the LCD only come on periodically when in Record. That would bounce the battery life up 5 fold. If I'm shooting a wedding I most likely want to look at it. If it's sitting on a tripod 50' away with sparks all over the place, I'll just sit in the car until the 12 minutes is up. To be a good coder, Canon, one must be able to have empathy.
Gripes:
1) Rapid exposure changes in video mode screw up my timelapses.
2) 12 minute record time? Seriously!!?? Get an algorithm! Buy one!
3) LCD burning battery when video recording.
4) Noise. Why do I have 20MP when I have to smooth in a 3x3 or 5x5 block?