Jeff Snyder
EF5
I ran across this story on the NOAA website:
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2005/s2387.htm
(Well, I originally ran across it on CNN at http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/02/10/weather...r.ap/index.html , but followed through to the NOAA article).
At any rate, I was wondering what improvements we'll see in terms of operational model delivery time (e.g. NAM runtimes, etc.). The article notes an improvement to make room for better physics, etc, to be included in numerical models, which I understand as preparing for the operational use of WRF model runs... Anyone have more specs on this?
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2005/s2387.htm
(Well, I originally ran across it on CNN at http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/02/10/weather...r.ap/index.html , but followed through to the NOAA article).
At any rate, I was wondering what improvements we'll see in terms of operational model delivery time (e.g. NAM runtimes, etc.). The article notes an improvement to make room for better physics, etc, to be included in numerical models, which I understand as preparing for the operational use of WRF model runs... Anyone have more specs on this?