• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

New weather radar to be built near Durango CO

I saw the article, too. After discussion amongst a group of academics & NWS forecasters, the general consensus is that the data from this site is unlikely to ever appear with NEXRAD data, i.e., you won't be seeing it on your GR feed or RadarScope. Looks like it will be privately operated.

The radar is likely to be C-band, so it will have limited range anyway.
 
As someone who lives in this notorious data hole, it sure would be nice if it were available on the Web in some way. It was decided some time ago that this would be built, so glad to hear they have found a site. That said, it seems of less value than it could be if the public cannot access it. As to the range, it does not need to be huge, as it is a fairly limited area around the Four Corners that does not have reasonably good data from Grand Junction or Albuquerque. But in that area, the status quo is pretty deficient, especially in the colder months when the cloud tops associated with precipitation are lower.
 
Every private radar that I know of with public use has a website. But feeding L2/L3 data is a cost, and there's no obligation to make that public.
 
I'd be fine if it has a website where I can access it. It is, as I understand, publicly funded, so it ought to be available to the public free in some way. It would be nice to get it through GR, Radarscope, or media-related radar sites, but as long as it is available to the public through some free website, I can live with it.
 
I kind of wondered about that when I read the article. It sounded like it was being publicly funded, but didn't necessarily sound publicly-owned.
While I'd rather see public-funding used for a true NWS station where its just available like the others, if it does have a free website that is ok..
 
Back
Top