• After witnessing the continued decrease of involvement in the SpotterNetwork staff in serving SN members with troubleshooting issues recently, I have unilaterally decided to terminate the relationship between SpotterNetwork's support and Stormtrack. I have witnessed multiple users unable to receive support weeks after initiating help threads on the forum. I find this lack of response from SpotterNetwork officials disappointing and a failure to hold up their end of the agreement that was made years ago, before I took over management of this site. In my opinion, having Stormtrack users sit and wait for so long to receive help on SpotterNetwork issues on the Stormtrack forums reflects poorly not only on SpotterNetwork, but on Stormtrack and (by association) me as well. Since the issue has not been satisfactorily addressed, I no longer wish for the Stormtrack forum to be associated with SpotterNetwork.

    I apologize to those who continue to have issues with the service and continue to see their issues left unaddressed. Please understand that the connection between ST and SN was put in place long before I had any say over it. But now that I am the "captain of this ship," it is within my right (nay, duty) to make adjustments as I see necessary. Ending this relationship is such an adjustment.

    For those who continue to need help, I recommend navigating a web browswer to SpotterNetwork's About page, and seeking the individuals listed on that page for all further inquiries about SpotterNetwork.

    From this moment forward, the SpotterNetwork sub-forum has been hidden/deleted and there will be no assurance that any SpotterNetwork issues brought up in any of Stormtrack's other sub-forums will be addressed. Do not rely on Stormtrack for help with SpotterNetwork issues.

    Sincerely, Jeff D.

2024-05-26 EVENT: IL/IN/MI/OH/KY/IA/MO

Joined
Mar 4, 2004
Messages
243
Location
Chicago, Illinois
Trends and model signals are alluding to potentially another warm frontal boundary-style setup for a discrete supercell thunderstorm mode on an arching boundary for portions of Northern Indiana and into the very southern tier of L. Michigan south of I-94 by late PM into early Sunday evening. 06z GFS squashes this idea and keeps the WF boundary, ample moisture, theta-e and MUCAPE's [that exceed 3000 J/kg] well south in around I-70. There certainly has been more model-to-model consistency with that forecast lean. More geospatial alignment [for potential SVR] between ECMWF and NAM 3KM this morning along with ample mid/upper level support [diffluent split evident at h500] hint at a tornado day somewhere in the "northern" zone [N. Indiana/Michiana/SWL. MI]. Obviously the deeper moisture, CAPEs, wind fields and assorted parameters are quite ample for a PM severe/tornado event in S. IL into C. IN and N. KY, already well advertised by the SWODY3.

I would prefer not to have another strong/significant tornado event close to, if not a top the home front... yet this pattern, inbound energy and timing are too eerily similar. Will watch how this actually evolves and expand further as Sunday approaches.

P.S. I just saw another thread was already started on this day/event. Jeff, or moderators, feel free to delete this extra one.
 
Back
Top