Upgrades to US forecasting including the FV3 forecast model

Discussion in 'Weather In The News' started by Bill Hark, Sep 3, 2018.

  1. Bill Hark

    Bill Hark EF5

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,208
    Likes Received:
    115
  2. rdale

    rdale EF5

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    6,749
    Likes Received:
    291
    It's about as bad as the existing GFS so far... Has its good times - but on an overall scale it's at the bottom of the ladder.
     
  3. Mark Blue

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,587
    Likes Received:
    233
    It sounds promising but I have no knowledge of what makes one model better than another, just end user experience which means little, if anything. I’ll be curious to hear what @Jeff Duda thinks about the FV3 since he now works with model development for a living.

    I’ve often wondered why the NWS hasn’t created more reporting stations across the CONUS grid to obtain more raw data to feed into our models. I presume money is at the top of the list as to why it hasn’t happened, but if they budgeted for a few new stations to be built per year it would soften the monetary blow. It could also be stretched out over several years until complete. Not full blown NWS stations but scaled down and automated as much as possible. We have to eventually catch up to the Europeans and the only way as I see it is to invest in our infrastructure. Easier said than done I suppose...
     
  4. MClarkson

    MClarkson EF5

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    20
    According to my verification stats for surface temp and wind, the regular flavor of the GFS already outperforms NAM, NAM-hires, RGEM, and GEM. This is quite robust... it is rare to find a station where the GFS doesnt win, and often wins by a lot. I do not have UKMET/EURO grib files to include unfortunately. Interested to see how FV3 stacks up... havent bothered with the exp. runs yet.
     
  5. Jeff House

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2008
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    163
    I have been looking at the FV3 for a couple months with a work subscription. Frankly I feel like the old GFS is better mid-term.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Jeff Duda

    Jeff Duda Resident meteorological expert
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,792
    Likes Received:
    1,142
    I don't work with the FV3, so I generally do not know how it performs. I don't get the impression that it is particularly bad or anything, either, though.
     
    • Like Like x 2

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice